CHSH Inequality

Here’s your simplified explanation of the CHSH Inequality

---

Think of it as a "Quantum Weirdness Test":

1. The Setup:
   Imagine two scientists, Alice and Bob, far apart. Each gets one half of an entangled particle pair, like linked magic coins.

2. The Game Rules:

• Alice has two buttons: She can measure her particle in setting A or setting A'.
• Bob has two buttons: He can measure his particle in setting B or setting B'.
• Each measurement gives a simple result: +1 or -1 (like Heads = +1, Tails = -1).
• They do this many times, randomly pressing their buttons each time.
• Afterwards, they compare notes.

3. The Classical Expectation (Hidden Variables):

• If Einstein was right (the particles had a pre-set plan — local hidden variables), the results should follow certain statistical limits.
• Specifically, they calculate a special score S based on how often their results agree or disagree depending on which combination of buttons they pressed (A & B, A & B', A' & B, A' & B').
• CHSH Inequality says: For any possible pre-set plan (hidden variables), this score S must be between -2 and +2. The absolute value of S must be less than or equal to 2. It cannot be larger than 2 or smaller than -2. This is the classical limit.

4. The Quantum Reality:

• Quantum mechanics predicts something different for entangled particles measured at specific angles (corresponding to A, A', B, B').
• When Alice and Bob calculate their score S using actual quantum particles, they find it can be as large as approximately 2.828 (which is 2√2) or as small as -2.828.
• This violates the CHSH Inequality, because the absolute value of S is greater than 2.

The Aha Moment – What It Means:

• Breaking the Limit: The experimental result (S ≈ ±2.828) is impossible under Einstein’s idea of local hidden variables (pre-set plans). It breaks through the classical limit of 2.
• Proof of Quantum Weirdness: This violation is direct experimental proof that:
  1. No hidden plan. The particles didn’t have definite, pre-determined states for all possible measurements before they were separated.
  2. Non-locality. The choice of measurement setting Alice makes instantly influences the possible outcomes Bob can get, and vice versa, even though they are far apart. The results are fundamentally interconnected in a way classical physics forbids.
  3. Quantum entanglement is real and stronger. The correlation between the particles is stronger than any classical correlation based on pre-shared information could ever be.

Analogy: The Colored Dice Game

Imagine Alice and Bob each have a special die.

• Classical (Hidden Variables): Each die secretly has all its faces for all possible color questions pre-set before they separate. They roll, compare results later. Their correlation score S can never exceed 2.
• Quantum (Entanglement): The dice are magically linked. When Alice rolls hers choosing a color, like "Red?", her roll instantly forces Bob’s die to configure itself specifically for the color question he asked, even if he asked a different one like "Blue?". This spooky coordination on the fly allows their results to be correlated in a way the pre-set dice could never achieve, pushing S above 2.

In Simple Terms:

The CHSH Inequality is a specific, practical way to test Bell’s Theorem. It sets a strict mathematical limit (absolute value of S ≤ 2) on how correlated the results of measurements on two separated objects can be if the universe obeys classical local realism — no spooky action, and properties are pre-determined. Quantum entanglement violates this limit. When scientists perform the CHSH experiment and get S greater than 2 (up to about 2.828), it proves the universe is fundamentally quantum: particles don’t have fixed properties until measured, and measuring one instantly influences its entangled partner, no matter the distance. It’s a cornerstone proof